Cold Electricity by Edwin Gray

What is Cold Electricity?

Incandescent bulbs glow but do not emit heat. On the other hand, incandescent bulbs absorb heat, which causes them to glow and Cold. It is a real but rare phenomenon because the technology is hidden or suppressed.

The phenomenon of consumer devices becoming cold as they consume power is a sign that "Cold Electricity" is powering a consuming device. In terms of its form, "Cold Electricity" also has a voltage supply that produces the same current as a conventional power source. Conventional power from the grid generates work on consuming devices and at the same time gives off heat. But with a Cold Electricity supply, the power-consuming loads tend to absorb the temperature in the environment, meaning they do not emit heat but, on the contrary, collect heat, i.e., get cold during operation.

Cold Electricity supplies are very rare because Cold Electricity is a technology that is not found in textbooks or university curricula. Previously, Nikola Tesla mentioned Cold Electricity during the development of Radiant Energy technology in his experiments.

Around 1958, Cold Electricity reappeared, discovered by Edwin Vincent Gray. Here is some brief information on Edwin Gray and Cold Electricity:

In 1958, Edwin V. Gray, Sr. discovered that the discharge of a high voltage capacitor could be shocked into releasing a huge, radiant, electrostatic burst. This energy spike was produced by his circuitry and captured in a special device Mr. Gray called his “conversion element switching tube.” The non-shocking, cold form of energy that came out of this “conversion tube” powered all of his demonstrations, appliances, and motors, as well as recharged his batteries. Mr. Gray referred to this process as “splitting the positive.” During the 1970’s, based on this discovery, Mr. Gray developed an 80 hp electric automobile engine that kept its batteries charged continuously. Hundreds of people witnessed dozens of demonstrations that Mr. Gray gave in his laboratory. His story is well documented in the following materials.

Edwin Gray performs Cold Electricity to the public and corporations

The essence of Cold Electricity:

The Cold Electricity phenomenon can only be accurately explained based on the Ether field theory: Cold Electricity is a state of tension in Ether that manifests in voltage and current when a coil with a magnetic field (also an Ether field) collapses inward (opposite space or counterspace). Ordinary electricity has a magnetic field that transforms into Space, while Cold Electricity has a magnetic field that collapses into the coil. It is also possible to call it the negative magnetic field on the coil that gives rise to Cold Electricity.

The Ether field (magnetic field) collapses into the "opposite space" (counterspace) creating negative entropy, resulting in the collection of heat from the outside environment from the electrical appliances that are consuming it.

Details of the magnetic field in the coil collapsing into "opposite space" and creating Cold Electricity:

Based on the work of Charles Proteus Steinmetz, Nikola Tesla, Faraday, and many other scientists on transients and voltage transients, one scientist, Eric P. Dollard, summarized the phenomenon: Electrical transients in Ether:

"Very interesting (and dangerous) phenomena manifest themselves when the current path is interrupted, thereby causing infinite resistance to appear. In this case resistance is best represented by its inverse, conductance. The conductance is then zero. Because the current vanished instantly the field collapses at a velocity approaching that of light. As EMF is directly related to velocity of flux, i tends towards infinity. Very powerful effects are produced because the field is attempting to maintain current by producing whatever EMF required. If a considerable amount of energy exists, say several kilowatt hours* (250 KWH for lightning stroke), the ensuing discharge can produce most profound effects and can completely destroy inadequately protected apparatus."

"Steinmetz in his book on the general or unified behavior of electricity The Theory and Calculation of Transient Electric Phenomena and Oscillation, points out that the inductance of any unit length of an isolated filamentary conductor must be infinite. Because no image currents exist to contain the magnetic field it can grow to infinite size. This large quantity of energy cannot be quickly retrieved due to the finite velocity of propagation of the magnetic field. This gives a non reactive or energy component to the inductance which is called electromagnetic radiation."

In order to interrupt the coil, the most commonly used device is the spark gap.

For example, at the Tesla coil, the capacitor discharges into the coil, and immediately after the discharge to the coil, the spark (plasma) is extinguished. At this point, the coil is open-circuited, and the Ether Field (magnetic field) collapses into "opposite space," creating negative entropy, along with a very high induced EMF. Again, the voltage discharges through the spark gap. But this discharge is caused by the coil being interrupted and not by the capacitor being charged to the breakdown voltage.

The primary winding of the Tesla transformer is interrupted, suddenly open-circuited with a spark gap design.

The famous Tesla coil also has Cold Electricity, but the overall circuit is a mixture of normal electricity and Cold Electricity. That's why Edwin Gray uses a "conversion element switching tube" to separate ordinary electricity from the circuit, and the result is pure Cold Electricity.

And of course, due to the resistance of the Ether after the voltage transient, free energy is created. The Tesla coil is also a free energy device if it is improved to extract the output for the intended use.

The above is a generalization for people to approach the essence of Cold Electricity. But to understand Cold Electricity well, you need to understand the "Ether field," Entropy, counterspace, dielectric and magnetic fields in Ether, etc. In-depth materials and books to supplement the Cold Electricity problem are listed down below:

• A Common Language for Electrical Engineering: Lone Pine Writings
• Ether Field Physics

Also See: Books by Eric Dollard

In addition to Edwin Gray's device, there are many other devices that generate Cold Electricity, such as those by Don Smith and John Bedini. For the academic field of electronics, such devices are nominally electronic devices that serve a purpose. But the truth is that they are created as free energy generators, that is, generators that do not use fuel. Because inherently, the output energy is greater than the input energy, and one has a self-powered mechanism that makes them work to generate electricity without the need for external kinetic energy.

A device has been proposed that harnesses the power of the Ether field collapsing into counterspace to generate Radiant Energy:

Homemade Generator - Ultimate Technology

▶️ Ancient Invention Generates Energy-On-Demand

🔹 Version from Nikola Tesla's "Magnifying Transmitter"
🔹 The "tension" for "electricity fractionation" to occur is the Earth's Potential Potential. To be precise, it is the tension of the Ether, and the electricity is the dynamic polarization of the Ether.
🔹 During "Electricity segment", the magnetic field collapses several times in short periods of time. That leads the voltage V = Φ/t to reach infinity (V → ∞) when t → 0

• V - The electromotive force which results from the production or consumption of the total magnetic induction Φ (Phi). The unit is the “Volt”. Where t is the time of magnetic field collapse from maximum to complete collapse.
• Research scholars also call it Tesla's technology called Radiant Energy from Electronic Circuits, Impulse Technology.

Ultimate Energizer Guide

🔹 There are also many other plans to create free energy generators including Self Powered AC Generator.

Below is Peter A. Lindemann's explanation of Edwin Gray's patent. The content is excerpted from the book by Peter A. Lindemann, you can see the entire book at the end of this article.

Decoding Gray's Patents

I have taken a great deal of time to explain the intricacies of  Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter because of how it directly relates to the operation of Ed Gray's cold electricity circuit. To better understand what his circuit is and how it operates, Figure 26 shows Gray's "schematic" on the left, as it is presented in Patent # 4,595,975, and on the right, it shows what I refer to as the "Simplified Gray Circuit `Schematic."' (I'm using the term "schematic" in quotes because this is not entirely a schematic diagram.)

Figure 26 Gray's Circuit "Schematic" and the Simplified Gray's Circuit "Schematic"

In order to better understand this circuit in its most fundamental form, I would like to eliminate a number of components, temporarily, that serve functions outside of its essential operation, as follows:

• Components # 64 and #66 (shown within the dotted-line box) indicate an alternate way of running the circuit from an AC supply. These parts can be eliminated without changing the circuit in any significant way because the circuit can be run from the batteries 
• Components # 42, # 44, and # 46, which are the safety overshoot mechanisms referred to earlier, can be eliminated because we learned in Chapter 1, reading from the patent text, that these parts are included simply to protect the circuit in case it generates too much energy.
• Component # 26, which Gray calls a "commutator," is part of the timing mechanism. However, the vacuum triode, # 28, is sufficient to give us the timing impulses for the discharge of our capacitor, so # 26 can be eliminated.
• Component # 48 is a switching mechanism that allows the operator to change which battery is powering the circuit and which battery the circuit is charging. This can be eliminated by simply indicating that battery 18 is running the circuit and battery 40 is receiving the charging impulses.

When all of these components are removed, we are left with the "Simplified Gray Circuit `Schematic"' as shown on the right side of the diagram.

Figure 27 shows Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter Circuit next to Gray's Cold Electricity Circuit. I call this The Common Features of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter and Gray's Cold E lectricity Circuit. The important common features are as follows:

• They both start off with a source of high voltage direct current. In Tesla's case, it's a high voltage direct current generator, Source "B". In Gray's case, it starts with a battery, # 18, whose output is chopped through a multi-vibrator, #20. The impulses coming from the multi-vibrator power the low voltage, primary winding on transformer #22. The high voltage secondary winding of # 22 is then rectified with the full wave bridge, # 24. The output from # 24 is high voltage DC. But either way, both circuits begin with high voltage DC.
• The next component in both circuits is the capacitor. In Tesla's circuit it is "C"; In Grays, it is # 16. Both circuits operate by having the capacitor charged repeatedly by the high voltage DC source.
• The next component in both circuits is the spark gap. In Tesla's circuit it is represented as "d-d". In Gray's diagram it is # 62. For each circuit to work properly, the spark in the gap must be characterized by two features: first, there must be a means to insure that the discharge will occur in only one direction, and second, there must be a means to control the duration of the spark. In the case of Tesla's circuit, we have the continuous pressure from the high voltage generator to insure the unidirectional discharge of the capacitor, and a magnetic field across the spark gap to blow-out the current as soon as it appears. The duration of the spark can be determined by both the strength of the magnetic field across the gap and by the size (capacitance) of the capacitor. In the case of Gray, we know that he was using very large capacitors, so he wasn't discharging the entire capacitor at one time. But his circuit was performing two functions: the resistor, # 30, limited the current in the discharge, and the vacuum tube, # 28, could not only shut off the discharge at whatever pulse duration he desired, but it also insured that no reversals of current appeared in this section of the circuit. So, again, all the necessary features are present.
• Next, both circuits have what I call the "Preferred Location for the ElectroRadiant Event." In Tesla's case, it is "two turns of stout wire," ("A") as he calls it, which is the primary of his electrical transformer. But as we know from reading Mr. Vassilatos, this is not a magnetically inductive transformer. The magnetic coupling is very weak between the primary and the secondary coils. In fact this device runs on what Tesla refers to as his new "electrostatic induction rules." In the case of Gray, the preferred location for the ElectroRadiant Event is what he calls his "conversion switching element tube," # 14. This component is clearly an electrostatic device, as we read earlier. It is specifically designed to have an explosive, electrostatic event radiate away from its central member.
• The next common element is the "Preferred Means to Intercept the Electro-Radiant Event." In Tesla's case, it's the secondary coil of his transformer, "F"; this is the conical or spiral shaped coil that Vassilatos mentions and that we've already seen in his patents. In Gray's case, it's the charge-receiving grids, # 34, that collect the radiant voltage. It's important to see that in both of these circuits, there is no direct connection between the source of energy and the "receiver element." Only the induced electroradiant charge appears on these output components.
• The next element is the "Connection to the Preferred Output." In Tesla's case, the output is the connection to the ground (E) and the elevated capacitance (E) that constitutes his World Broadcast System. In Gray' case, the output discharges from the "charge receiving grids" are directed to the inductive load, # 36. This element can represent either the jumping magnets or a transformer output that ran his cold electric circuit or the repulsive magnets in his motor. So again, each circuit has a preferred means to intercept the Electro-Radiant Event and a preferred method to connect it to the output.
• And finally, Gray was able to reconvert some of this excess energy back into ordinary electricity, and recycle enough of it to actually recharge his battery, as we read earlier. Tesla was not concerned with this recycling process, since his system was designed to be powered by a hydroelectric power plant.

Common Features of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter and Gray's Cold Electricity Circuit

Figure 27 Common Features of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter and Gray's Cold Electricity Circuit

Figure 28 Gray's Circuit “Schematic

So it is clear from this analysis that Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter and Gray's Cold Electricity Circuits are, for all intents and purposes, the same circuit. They do the same things, in the same places, in slightly different ways, and they both claim to produce extremely high gains of a cold form of "electrostatic" energy in the output. Tesla's system was obviously much, much larger since he was planning to power up the whole world. Gray was only planning to power up your home or your car. But for all intents and purposes, these systems perform the same functions and release the same "ElectroRadiant" gain mechanism.

Once again, Figure 28 shows Gray's circuit "schematic" from his "Efficient Power Supply Suitable For Inductive Loads" patent. I realized, after studying this diagram for a long time, that there were a number of basic problems with the way it was drawn. First of all, let's look at component # 42. As this is drawn (remember that this is a spark overshoot device) there is a line connecting all the way through the bottom half. If this were supposed to be an actual electrical connection, it would produce a short circuit, and would not allow capacitor # 16 to charge up. So, it can clearly be seen that this part of the drawing has problems.

Next we will look at components # 26 and # 28 which are defined in the patent text as follows:

Control of the conversion switching element tube is maintained by commutator 26. A series of contacts mounted radially about a shaft or a solid state switching device sensitive to time or other variable may be used for this control element. A switching element tube type one-way energy path, 28, is introduced between the commutator device and the conversion switching element tube to prevent high energy arcing at the commutator current path.

If the commutator, # 26, were a solid state device, there would be no "arcing" to prevent. Therefore, the stated purpose of # 28 in the patent text is misleading. However, component # 28 is described as a "one-way energy path." Gray is specifically saying that energy in this section of the circuit can only be allowed to move in one direction. This is the important condition to establish, because it is in strict compliance with the conditions Tesla set forth in order to create the "ElectroRadiant" event. There is also another glaring omission in connection to component # 28. The control grid in this triode device is not attached to anything, and that, of course, is what could control the timing of the spark discharge. In the patent text, there is no mention of how component # 28 functions and no mention of how the grid is controlled. Recognizing that component # 28 had no means of being controlled was an important realization for me.

The next problems I found were in the inductive load, component # 36. The first is that # 36 is described as an inductor but is not illustrated by a coil symbol as we see with components # 22 and # 66. Second, there are also two odd arrows associated with this component. The patent text implies that these may actually be two coils that repel each other to produce mechanical work. With this in mind, the arrows may represent the idea of two members deflected away from each other in some way. This is not made clear in the patent text. Third, we don't see any real current path through this component, so we don't know where the discharge goes. And finally, fourth, the circuit comes to the second capacitor, # 38. In the patent text this component is described as being a part of the recharging mechanism. However, none of these component connections make any sense. For instance, if impulses coming from the inductor, # 36, start charging up capacitor # 38, there are no circuit connections shown that would allow it ever to be discharged. Therefore, because of these omissions, I came to view this section of the circuit more as a block diagram than as an actual schematic.

I came to the conclusion that all that is really apparent is that the charge receiving grids are in relationship to the inductive load, which is in relationship to the receiving capacitor, which is in some relationship to the recharging of the battery. Therefore, this section is a block diagram, merely indicating that these components are in relationship to each other, rather than showing exactly how they are wired together.

As we move towards a more complete understanding of what Gray's schematic diagram may actually look like, we will now turn our attention to his "conversion element switching tube" (Figure 29). This, finally, is the heart of the matter, the component that Gray always referred to as the "super secret means of generating and mixing static electricity." This is the element where the free energy is generated and collected.

The conversion element switching tube is really three components in one. It consists of the resistor # 30, the spark gap (the space between # 32 and # 12), and the area surrounded by the charge-receiving grids (# 34a & # 34b). Even though it is not stated in the patent text, we do know that the spark-gap is rated at about 3,000 volts, based on statements made by Gray in the newspaper articles quoted in Chapter 1. The rear extension of what Gray calls his "high voltage anode" (# 12) is the surface from which the Electro-Radiant event will be projected. This free energy blast will radiate away from # 12, perpendicular to the flow of current in the path of the spark discharge moving down that surface. The material composition of # 12 is represented as being relatively thick. It is not just a wire. But what are its characteristics? The patent doesn't describe them. We might hypothesize that this material is a bare metal with no insulation on it. It could possibly have a mirror finish, made of stainless steel or a non-magnetic material. A wide variety of options need to be tested here, but very possibly the element's diameter could be an important factor, as well as whether or not it is solid or hollow. These questions need to be explored and remain among the only unknowns.

The concentric receiving grids (# 34a & # 34b) around # 12 are designed to intercept the electro-radiant event. As indicated before, the patent states, "This element utilizes a low voltage anode, a high voltage anode, and one or more electrostatic or charge-receiving grids." This drawing clearly shows two charge-receiving grids. In the section from Gray's patent, which refers to this component, he says: 

The shape and spacing of the electrostatic grids is also susceptible to variations of application, voltage, current, and energy requirements.It is the contention of the inventor that by judicious mating of the elements of the conversion switching element tube and the proper selection of the components of the circuit elements of the system, the desired theoretical results may be achieved. It is the inventor's contention that this mating and selection process is well within the capabilities of intensive research and development technique.

I'm sure this was his very nice way of saying, "This is all I'm going to tell you, but you can probably figure it out if you know what you're doing." Then he says:

The preferred embodiment of this invention merely assumes optimum utilization and optimum benefit from this invention when used with portable energy devices similar in principle to the wet cell or dry cell battery. This invention proposes to utilize the energy contained in an internallygenerated, high-voltage electric spike to electrically energize an inductive load, this inductive load being then capable of converting the energy so supplied into a useful electrical or mechanical output.

Figure 29 Grays Conversion Tube Diagram

Figure 30 Edwin Gray and His # 6 Motor Prototype

Here we have clear statements by Gray that the conversion element switching tube is the source of the useful outputs. In fact, this component is what powered his magnet popping experiment; this is what ran his circuit, that ran the TV, radios, and light bulbs, and this is the component that ran his motor. This is the element where the energy is both magnified and characterized as "cold electricity." Henceforth, I will refer to this structure as an "Electro-Radiant Transceiver", because it is designed to both broadcast and receive the "Electro-Radiant Event."

Having established these points, there are still a number of unknowns which need to be explored. For instance, there appears to be no provision, in these drawings or in the patent text, to determine whether or no there's a vacuum in this enclosure, or if it is filled with air or some other gas. The quotes from Gray in the NewsReal article reveal that he learned how to harness this effect by studying lightning. The article also states that he noticed lightning was stronger nearer the ground and that he assumed it had something to do with "more air." So, it is possible that the inside of the tube is not a vacuum environment. Although we know that the output "cold electricity" won't shock you, the capacitor discharge could, so the case around the component, # 50, might still be for safety reasons. Two safe assumptions are: 1) # 50 can be considered a mechanical means of holding the components together, and 2) that there is probably air in this enclosure.

We also don't know the physical size of this device, and we don't know the physical dimensions of the charge receiving grids, including their length or diameter. That is, until we examine the photographic evidence of Tom Valentine.

Figure 31 Edwin Gray and Fritz Lens in 1973 

In Figure 30 (and the color photograph shown on the back cover of the book), Ed Gray is standing before a meeting of his stockholders. In the enlargement of the inset image on the back cover, the “magic component” can clearly be seen. A lot of information is revealed in this photograph about the layout of the device; in particular, the physical dimensions of the conversion element switching tubes, that I am now calling the Electro-Radiant Transceivers. There is a row of three conversion tubes and each one is being fed by the discharge of a single capacitor. Three very large capacitors can easily be seen. I had this image digitally scanned, and when I looked at the markings on this capacitor in extreme magnification, it read “2 micro-farads” and “4000 Volts DC.”

So, where Gray's motor patent shows a bank of eighteen capacitors being charged and discharged in sequence to run the motor, that's not what he was really doing. The evidence from the circuit patent and this photograph clearly shows that the motor coils were being powered from the output of the conversion tubes, and not directly from the capacitor discharges. The photograph shows only one wire coming out of each of the three conversion tubes going up to the commutator, with just a single wire return. So, it is most likely that Gray is discharging the charge receiving grids to ground through his magnet coils. The inset enlargement clearly shows two charge receiving grids in the tube, about 1/4 of an inch away from each other. Exactly how they are connected is still not certain. The patent suggests that each grid is wired out to the plug, # 60, and that there is one connection from there to the output Inductor.

Figure 31 shows another unpublished photograph taken by Tom Valentine in Ed Gray's laboratory in 1973, showing Ed Gray and Fritz Lens at their laboratory bench. The arrangement of parts shown in the foreground is the setup used to demonstrate the "popping magnets." In the lower left portion of the photograph is what appears to be an air core transformer wound on a 4- inch diameter piece of PVC, resting on some wooden blocks (Figure 32). This circuit element is probably taking the discharge from the conversion element switching tube and inductively coupling it to a secondary winding. It is the secondary winding that powers the magnets, which are wired in series, making them fly away from each other. In order to create repulsive impulses that are timed perfectly to each other, Gray has this air core transformer powering the magnets simultaneously. He is using an air core transformer here in the first stage, because the impulse frequency is so high. A digitally-enhanced close-up image of this component shows the central winding as two layers of ten turns each of what looks like spark plug wire. 

Figure 32 Gray's Inductive Load

 This, then, is Gray's “inductive load.” This is how he is harnessing the energy from the charge receiving grids of the conversion element switching tube, enabling him to do real work.

But possibly the best piece of evidence that supports this concept of the output, is that found in Tesla's US Patent # 685,958 titled "Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy." Figure 33 shows one of the illustrations from this patent. Here we see plate "P" being exposed to some source of Radiant Energy and then being discharged to ground through the primary winding of a transformer. So all of the evidence supports this idea of the output.

At this point, we have enough evidence to theorize on what Edwin Gray's cold electricity circuit schematic may actually be. Figure 34 is a diagram I created called “Probable Schematic for Edwin Gray's Cold Electricity Circuit.” The front end is identical to Gray's drawing, complete with the battery, # 40, multi-vibrator, # 20, step-up transformer, # 22, full-wave bridge, # 24, capacitor, # 16, and the protective mechanisms, # 42, # 44, and # 46. Next, just like Gray's again, is the Electro-Radiant Transceiver mechanism, # 34, showing the spark gap, # 62, resistor,# 30, vacuum grid of the triode is a timer control circuit capable of generating pulse trains as needed, with pulse durations in the 10 to 50- microsecond range.

Figure 33 Tesla's Radiant Energy Method

In the output section, I show the two grids of the Electro-Radiant Transceiver, # 34, wired to each other. They, in turn are connected to the primary of the air core transformer, which is connected to the ground. The secondary of the air core transformer is a voltage step-down to power lights and other medium voltage appliances. This section of the circuit is also connected to another step-down transformer whose secondary would be rectified to charge another capacitor, # 38. As current pulses accumulate, this capacitor, # 38, will charge to a voltage that is higher than battery # 18, and therefore will begin to charge this secondary battery

The spark overshoot mechanism, # 42, is shown as two separate high voltage spark gaps, one on the primary line used to dump any Electro-Radiant discharge that backs up in the primary circuit, and the other used to dump any excess voltage in the output circuit.

Referring to the vacuum tube # 28, we know first of all, according to Vassilatos, that in order to create the nonshocking form of electricity, Tesla said the spark duration must be limited to anything less than 100 microseconds. We also know from Dr. Chalfin's statement in the NewsReal article, that Gray used power for “only a small fraction of a millisecond.” The pulse timing I have suggested, at between 10 and 50 microseconds, represents between 1% and 5% of a millisecond. This certainly represents “a small fraction.” Secondly, the vacuum tube # 28 also acts like a super-fast diode to prevent any reversals in current.

As stated before, capacitor # 16 discharges through the Electro-Radiant Transceiver back to the positive of the battery. Normally, if a capacitor is discharged, the high voltage positive would be discharged back to the negative terminal. However, it is indicated that Gray discharged his capacitor back to the positive of the battery. Tesla clearly showed that this is not necessary to create the ElectroRadiant Event, but Gray must have felt it was important. The significance of this is not yet known, but it certainly must be related to his idea of "splitting the positive," a piece of jargon used in early reports about his technology. Clearly, it had nothing to do with "recharging" battery # 40. The voltage drop at the spark gap reduces the amount of energy that can be returned to this battery to near zero. So this cannot be the recharging mechanism. In all probability, by connecting back to the positive of the battery, Gray is characterizing the ElectroRadiant Event in a more "positive" way. When I say "positive", I mean electropositive. So, now we have some notion of where Gray's terminology, "splitting the positive" comes from, and what its significance might be. Also, Gray claims that he uses only a positive form of energy. Certainly what gets radiated out onto his charge receiving grids is a positive, electrostatic charge. When that impulse is discharged to ground, he is only using the positive side of electricity. Therefore, everything Gray said makes sense.

Figure 34 Probable Schematic for Gray's Cold Electricity Circuit

The photographic evidence in the image on the back cover strongly suggests that the charge receiving grids in Gray's conversion tubes are copper. As we have said before, ElectroRadiant effects create “electronic” responses in certain metals. Gray must have figured out that he could create an electronic charge on his receiving grids if he intercepted the ElectroRadiant Event on copper. In Tesla's large radiant energy system, he learned to avoid using copper to prevent the electronic contamination it created. But in Gray's smaller system, this was just what he needed. The more the Electro-Radiant energy interacts with copper again, the sooner it returns to a form of electricity that will actually charge the battery in a fairly normal way. This then is how Edwin Gray produced cold electricity.

To summarize, Gray's cold electricity circuit runs like this: It starts with power out of the battery; he raises it to 3000 volts DC that he stores in a very large capacitor. He then discharges impulses through a spark gap, clipped by a vacuum tube, such that the impulse duration is less than 50 microseconds. This staccato of impulses flows through the Electro-Radiant Transceiver, which creates a series of radiant, electrostatic fields of spatially distributed voltage that is picked up by the charge-receiving grids. As soon as the ElectroRadiant Event ceases, these charged grids discharge to ground through the primary of the “inductive load.” The output recovery system is inductively coupled to this discharge primary with a voltage step-down to run light bulbs and other medium voltage appliances, as well as another step down transformer to recharge the secondary battery. By switching the batteries back and forth periodically, Gray could keep the system going indefinitely, and still produce a sizable output.

At this point, there is only one final error to point out. In the patent text, Gray proposes a theory as to where the excess energy is coming from. He suggests that the gain in energy that appears on the receiving grids is the “equivalent” of the current from the low voltage anode (battery # 40) times the voltage from the high voltage anode (Capacitor # 16), combining in the spark discharge. He states: “Because the duration of the arc is very short, the instantaneous voltage, and instantaneous current may both be very high. The instantaneous peak apparent power is therefore, also very high.” This is clearly not true. I have tried dozens of methods to combine the voltage from one source with the current from another source in an attempt to create a power cross-product. It doesn't work. But the best evidence that Gray was not doing this he in these two points. First, such a scheme, if it were possible, would produce normal, HOT electricity. And second, Gray's conversion tube has a resistor between the spark-gap and the battery source, clearly blocking the availability of unlimited current. So, Gray's explanation of the “gain mechanism” cannot be true. He either put this in the patent because he didn't really understand the effect himself, or because he thought this explanation would get past the Patent examiners more easily. (I personally believe Gray understood how to create the effect, but he didn't know how to explain it.)

Gray's statement that he only used 1% of the energy and that 99% went back into the battery is actually a meaningless attempt to explain this phenomenon in Thermodynamic terms. Actually, all of the energy in his primary circuit is lost. The capacitor # 16 discharges into the spark-gap, where 99% of the work potential of the energy is lost in the voltage drop, not to mention the fact that there is no output “work device” in the discharge path to take advantage of the impulse. So, 100% of the input energy is lost in terms of ordinary work conversion. It does do something else though. It produces a series of unidirectional discharges that release a series of “ElectroRadiant” events that are discharged through the real output “work device.” This work output is 100 times greater than the energy lost to create it.

 

If, at this point, there is still skepticism regarding the properties of Gray's circuit, the following may help to put all of this in perspective. Figure 35 shows a classic image of the enigmatic Testatika Machine, designed by Paul Baumann at the Methernitha Community in Linden, Switzerland. Mr. Baumann claims he learned how to build this device by studying lightning. It has a Wimshurst Machine as the high voltage, electro-static front end, which charges two capacitors or Leyden Jars. The high voltage from those capacitors goes down into the tops of the large cans, (the insides of which Mr. Baumann has never let anyone see) then, comes out the bottoms and meets in a spark gap. There has been endless speculation regarding the construction of these “big cans,” ranging from Uraniumdoped capacitors to strange arrangements of crystals and magnets. But, I submit to you that these “big cans” are Electro-Radiant Transceivers, and that they are not altogether different from Gray's Conversion Tube design.

It is interesting to note that Mr. Baumann has placed one can on either side of the spark-gap, the first, probably producing a positive Electro-Radiant Event, and the second, producing a negative Electro-Radiant Event. You may recall that Vassilatos reported that Tesla said, depending on the location of the spark-gap, he could either project a charge or deplete a charge from a surface. So this is what a fully balanced system might look like, where the output pulses actually resolve the charge from an Electro-Radiant positive surface to an Electro-Radiant negative surface, instead of just from one grid to ground, like in Gray's system.

Figure 36 clearly shows that this little Wimshurst Machine has no trouble at all creating big lighting effects. The claim in this image is 1,000 watts of light. The gain here must be close to 1000 to 1, not to mention the fact that the machine is turning itself.

All the evidence supports the conclusion that Edwin Gray's “Cold Electricity” circuit runs on Radiant Energy, and is a “close cousin” of devices developed by Dr. Nikola Tesla and Dr. Thomas Henry Moray. This also places it within a larger group of technologies that effectively tap the Ether for usable work. It is the only explanation that fits all of the evidence

In order to understand these Etheric technologies better, the researcher must study only those teachings that contribute to these vitalistic traditions. The model of the Ether that I have found to be the most accurate and useful, is that set of ideas put forward by Dr. Rudolf Steiner. (The best source book to study Steiner's Ether model is E theric F ormative F orces in Cosmos, E arth and Man by Dr. Guenther Wachsmuth.) In this model, there are four primary octaves of the Ether. These are the Light Ether, the Warmth Ether, the Chemical Ether, and the integrated synthesis of these first three, called the Life Ether. Steiner describes electricity as “an unnatural combination of Warmth Ether and Light Ether.” The term “unnatural” used here simply means, not found in nature. While these terms are slightly different, you may be able to see the parallels between this idea and the conclusions that Tesla was arriving at. The Light Ether is related to voltage, capacitance and the dielectric forces in nature, where as the Warmth Ether is related to current, resistance, and the magnetic forces in nature. Longitudinal rays of Light Ether propagate instantaneously to any distance, even to interstellar and inter-galactic distances. This medium is cool, and not wholly responsive to what is generally referred to as electrical resistance. This means that even Ohm's Law is useless for accurately determining circuit behaviors when this medium is present.

Figure 35 Paul Baumann's Testatika Machine

Figure 36 Testatika Machine Lighting a Light Bulb

More importantly, however, this relates to the great quest for the so-called “room temperature super-conductor.” It's possible that looking for the lowest resistance conductor may be the wrong goal. A purified stream of Light Ether is the true “room temperature super-conductee.” This medium is best “conducted” by pure carbon, according to Tesla, but it can also be "reflected" down a wide variety of mirror finish, silver metals, and transparent plastic polymers.

Electricity is not a monolithic event, and it is definitely not simply the movement of electrons. Tesla demonstrated that electricity can be split into its Warmth Ether and Light Ether fractions. When this happens, the Light Ether speeds off at right angles, leaving the Warmth Ether behind, and entrains a huge volume of energy from the environment. It is imperative for modern day researchers to understand that the Laws of Thermodynamics and Maxwell's equations do not pertain to Etheric technologies, and therefore do not define the total set of possible realities that can be investigated in electrical science.

Besides Tesla, Gray, and Baumann, there are many other inventors who also discovered how to tap the Ether and make it do useful work. Among these are: John W. Keely in 1872, Nathan B. Stubblefield in 1880, Thomas Henry Moray in 1926, Viktor Schauberger in the 1920's, Dr. Wilhelm Reich in 1940, and dozens of others in the last 50 years. Most notably are Trevor Constable, and Dr. Robert Adams, of New Zealand.

In light of this, there is ample evidence to suggest that God has been trying to give the peoples of this world low cost, clean energy, in the form of Etheric technology for over 120 years. It is time to spiritually wake up, and graciously accept the Divine gift.

Three U.S. Patents by Edwin V. Gray 

1. USP # 3,890,548 - "Pulsed Capacitor Discharge E lectric E ngine" 

2. USP # 4,595,977 -"E fficient Power Supply Suitable for Inductive Loads" 

3. USP # 4,661,747 - "E fficient E lectrical Conversion Switching Tube Suitable for Inductive Loads

See the full book "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity":

Note 1. Peter A. Lindemann attests that incandescent bulbs and other electrical appliances are getting cold when consuming "Cold Electricity".

Nikola Tesla's Free Energy-generating technology proposals, including Don Smith's refrigeration equipment:

Two types of power generation technology (generator) of Nikola Tesla

1. 🔹  Radiant energy
2. 🔹  AC generator - Free Energy

Tesla Technology

🔹 Tesla Technology and "Free Energy" in practical application

Note 2: ULTIMATE ENERGIZER GUIDE is a guide to creating a radiant energy device, it is listed as a Cold Electricity generator and is also an improvement on Don Smith's free energy generator.

SEA of ​​Energy Emerges from Ground - Smith's Free Energy Electronic Circuits - ULTIMATE ENERGIZER (video):