Thermal Energy Cell - by Christopher ECCLES

Chris Davies, Managing Director, Tel +44 (01206) 322496

Chris Davies, Managing Director, Tel +44 (01206) 322496

The TEC is silent unlike air source heat pumps.

Significantly reduces the cost of heating with electricity.

Has the benefit of economically providing continuous heat generation.

Saves carbon emissions through increased energy output with no additional carbon dioxide generation.

Removes the need for unfriendly night time storage.

Usable with other sustainable and renewable energy sources such as photovoltaic, fuel cells, wind power, Stirling cycle engines, and tidal and hydro power etc.

Is conventionally installed and can directly replace gas based heating system.

Is an economic substitute for heating with gas or oil.

The TEC, compared with ground source heat pumps, does not require a bore hole or a large area of land.


"Take Water and Potash, Add Electricity and Get -- A Mystery" - by Robert Matthews, Science Correspondent

British researchers believe that they have made a groundbreaking scientific discovery after apparently managing to "create" energy from hydrogen atoms.

In results independently verified at Bristol University, a team from Gardner Watts - an environmental technology company based in Dedham, Essex - show a "thermal energy cell" which appears to produce hundreds of times more energy than that put into it. If the findings are correct and can be reproduced on a commercial scale, the thermal energy cell could become a feature of every home, heating water for a fraction of the cost and cutting fuel bills by at least 90 per cent.


The makers of the cell, which passes an electric current through a liquid between two electrodes, admit that they cannot explain precisely how the invention works. They insist, however, that their cell is not just a repeat of the notorious "cold fusion" debacle of the late 1980s. Then two scientists claimed to have found a way of generating nuclear energy from a similar-looking device at room temperature. The findings were widely challenged and the scientists, Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, accused of incompetence, fled America to set up labs in France.

"We are absolutely not saying this is cold fusion, or that we have found a way round the law of energy conservation," said Christopher Davies, the managing director of Gardner Watts.

"What we are saying is that the device seems to tap into another, previously unrecognised source of energy."

According to Mr Davies, the cell is the product of research into the fundamental properties of hydrogen, the most common element in the universe. He argues that calculations based on quantum theory, the laws of the sub-atomic world, suggest that hydrogen can exist in a so-called metastable state that harbours a potential source of extra energy.

This theory suggests that if electricity were passed into a mixture of water and a chemical catalyst, the extra energy would be released in the form of heat.

After some experimentation, the team found that a small amount of electricity passed through a mixture of water and potassium carbonate - potash - released an astonishing amount of energy.

"It generates a lot of heat in a very small volume," said Christopher Eccles, the chief scientist at Gardner Watts.

The findings of the Gardner Watts team were tested by Dr Jason Riley of Bristol University, who found energy gains of between three and 26 times what had been put in.

In a written report, Dr Riley concluded: "Using the apparatus supplied by Gardner Watts and the procedure of analysis suggested by the company, there appears to be an energy gain in the system."

In tests performed for The Telegraph, the cell heated water to near-boiling, apparently producing more than three times the amount of energy fed into it.

Scientists admit to being astonished by the sheer size of the energy increase produced by the cell. "I've never seen a claim like this before," said Prof Stephen Smith of the physics department at Essex University.

"In the case of cold fusion, people talked about getting a 10 per cent energy gain or so, which could be explained away quite easily but this is much too big for that."

Prof Smith said he was sceptical about the theory put forward by the company. He conceded, however, that scientists had also been baffled by the source of energy driving radioactivity, as the key equation involved - Einstein's famous E = MC2 - had yet to be discovered.

According to Prof Smith, if there is a flaw in the company's claims, it lies in the measurement of the amount of electrical energy pumped into the cell. It is possible that, as sparks pass between the electrodes, there is an energy surge which would not be picked up by the instruments measuring the electrical input.

Prof Smith said: "This needs to be very carefully checked, as there could be far more energy going in than the makers think."

Prof Smith's views were echoed by Dr Riley, who said: "There's no doubt that there was a heat rise but I'd like to see a more thorough investigation of the electrical energy supplied into the cell."

While many scientists are trying to solve the mystery of the thermal energy cell, its huge commercial potential has already caused interest.

Cambridge Consultants, one of Britain's most prestigious technology consultancies, has teamed up with Mr Davies and his colleagues to develop a working prototype. "We've had a multi-disciplinary team working on this, and we're perplexed," said Duncan Bishop, head of process development at Cambridge Consultants.

"We are offering to risk-share on it, as it will need about £200,000 to prove the principle behind it."

According to the Gardner Watts team, it will take about six months to carry out tests putting the reality of the effect beyond all doubt. The company then plans to develop a prototype capable of turning less than one kilowatt of electrical power into 10 kilowatts of heat.

Mr Davies said: "The technology could be licensed by a company making household boilers for the domestic market. " He added that the plan is to have the first thermal energy cell devices on the market within two years.


Hot stuff: Ecowatts boss Paul Calver with the device

Related: Ancient Technology and the Truth about Today's Science

Recommended for you: A technology that exploits Lenz's voltage pulse and force cancellation in the generator (copyrighted by John Searl and the research team), it is also the same method that Nikola Tesla used

Data breaches about this energy device is spreading over the internet.

The upcoming energy crisis, is knocking to our doorstep, and the "Elite" are not talking about this, under the pretext of not creating panic among the population.
But the actual truth is that a information about a secret little known energy device is making waves on the internet, and they are trying to take your mind of it.
The times we live in are dangerous, but we do not see that the richer are getting more rich, and the powerful are getting more powerful.
The scary part for them is, they are losing the power due to the data information which is leaked online, and this is something they do not have all the control over it, for the time at least.

Take the control in your own hands!

Prepare to learn something amazing and let's put them where they belong, and let them see what it's like to be in our shoes.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN SOMETHING AMAZING  ✰* ✰* ✰* ✰* ✰*
👆


        How This 12-inch Miracle Tube Could Halve Heating Bills

        Amazing British invention creates MORE energy than you put into it - and could soon be warming your home

        It sounds too good to be true - not to mention the fact that it violates almost every known law of physics.

        But British scientists claim they have invented a revolutionary device that seems to 'create' energy from virtually nothing.

        Their so-called thermal energy cell could soon be fitted into ordinary homes, halving domestic heating bills and making a major contribution towards cutting carbon emissions.

        Even the makers of the device are at a loss to explain exactly how it works - but sceptical independent scientists carried out their own tests and discovered that the 12in x 2in tube really does produce far more heat energy than the electrical energy put in.

        The device seems to break the fundamental physical law that energy cannot be created from nothing - but researchers believe it taps into a previously unrecognised source of energy, stored at a sub-atomic level within the hydrogen atoms in water.

        The system - developed by scientists at a firm called Ecowatts in a nondescript laboratory on an industrial estate at Lancing, West Sussex - involves passing an electrical current through a mixture of water, potassium carbonate (otherwise known as potash) and a secret liquid catalyst, based on chrome.

        This creates a reaction that releases an incredible amount of energy compared to that put in. If the reaction takes place in a unit surrounded by water, the liquid heats up, which could form the basis for a household heating system.

        If the technology can be developed on a domestic scale, it means consumers will need much less energy for heating and hot water - creating smaller bills and fewer greenhouse gases.

        Jim Lyons, of the University of York, independently evaluated the system. He said: 'Let's be honest, people are generally pretty sceptical about this kind of thing. Our team was happy to take on the evaluation, even if to prove it didn't work.

        'But this is a very efficient replacement for the traditional immersion heater. We have examined this interesting technology and when we got the rig operating, we were getting 150 to 200 per cent more energy out than we put in, without trying too hard.

        People are sceptical - but somehow it works

        'We are still not clear about the science involved here, because the physics and chemistry are very different-to everything that has gone before. Our challenge now is to study the science and how it works.'

        The device has taken ten years of painstaking work by a small team at Ecowatts' tiny red-brick laboratory, and bosses predict a household version of their device will be ready to go on sale within the next 18 months.

        The project, which has cost the company £1.4million, has the backing of the Department of Trade and Industry, which is keen to help poorer families without traditional central heating or who cannot afford rocketing fuel bills.

        Ecowatts says the device will cost between £1,500 and £2,000, in line with the price of traditional systems.

        The development of the groundbreaking technology results from a chance meeting between Ecowatts chairman Chris Davies, his wife Jane and an Irish inventor, Christopher Eccles, while the couple were on holiday near Shannon in 1998.

        After the inventor showed the couple his laboratory experiments, Mrs Davies, immediately signed a £20,000 cheque on the bonnet of her car and handed it over to Mr Eccles.

        He later became chief scientist of Ecowatts' parent company Gardner Watts, but has since left after 'falling out' with the company, according to insiders. Sadly, Mrs Davies died three years ago, so she will be unable to share in the success of her husband's development of the idea.

        Mr Davies, now 75, of Dedham, Essex, was unavailable for comment last night.

        But Ecowatts chief executive Paul Calver said: 'When Jane Davies whipped out her cheque book, it turned out to be a very good investment indeed.

        'She and Chris were always interested in ecology and now it looks as if our heat exchanger system is ready to go on sale soon. We're producing a device in the next nine months to heat radiators.

        'Most British homes rely on gas, and the Government has admitted there is a problem getting a substitute. Our device will help solve that.'

        Sustainable energy expert Professor Saffa Riffat, of Nottingham University, has also led a team investigating the system.

        He said: 'The concept is very interesting and it could be a major breakthrough, but more tests are required. We will be doing further checks.'


        EcoWatts "Free Energy" Device Rebuffed, BBC Falls For It. Posted by Conrad Quilty-Harper

        EcoWatts and its fake free energy gadget is back in the limelight again, with the BBC Breakfast Show falling hook, line, and sinker in an interview with the company's "CEO" Paul Calver. Calver stated that "we're still getting to the question of why it works," explaining to a BBC presenter his bewilderment at his very own creation. The response from the interviewer? "The point is it does." Unfortunately, the point is that it almost certainly doesn't. Ben Goldacre used his excellent Bad Science Guardian column this week to dig up some dirt on the dodgy company, and managed to find a scientist who gave his stamp of approval to a similar free energy gadget four years back: "Using the apparatus provided, it's true, this scientist could get incredible results: the meters would read zero, and yet water would boil in around five minutes. Because the meters provided weren't working." The company that provided this former gadget along with the "broken" meters? EcoWatts.

        See Also: Harmonic Energy Exchange Device

        WO 00/25320
        "Energy Generation"
        (4 May 2000) Cl. G21B 1/00
        Christopher Eccles

        Abstract

        Methods and apparatus are described for releasing energy from hydrogen and/or deuterium atoms. An electrolyte is provided which has a catalyst therein suitable for initiating transitions of hydrogen and/or deuterium atoms in the electrolyte to a sub-ground energy state. A plasma discharge is generated in the electrolyte to release energy by fusing the atoms together.

        Description

        The present invention relates to the generation of electricity, and more particularly to the release of hydrogen and fusion of light atomic nuclei.

        Normally, fusion processes are able to be initiated only at extremely high temperatures, as found in the vicinity of a nuclear fusion (uranium or plutonium) detonation. This is the principle of most thermonuclear bombs. Such a release of energy is impractical as a means of providing the power to generate electricity and heat for distribution, as it occurs too rapidly with too high a magnitude for it to be manageable.

        In recent years, many attempts have been made to initiate controlled fusion processes at high temperatures by the enclosure of a region of plasma-discharge within a confined space, such as a toroidal chamber, using electromagnetic restraint. Such attempts have met with little commercial success to date as systems which employ such a technique have so far consumed more energy than they have produced and are not continuous processes.

        Another approach which has been attempted in order to achieve fusion of light nuclei has been the so-called "cold fusion" technique, in which deuterium atoms have been induced to tunnel into the crystal lattice of a metal such as palladium during electrolysis. It is claimed that the atoms are forced together in the lattice, overcoming the repulsive electrostatic force. However, no clear and unambiguous demonstration of successful cold fusion has yet been presented publicly.

        The present invention provides a method of releasing energy comprising the steps of providing an electrolyte having a catalyst therein, the catalyst being suitable for initiating transitions of hydrogen and/or deuterium atoms in the electrolyte to a sub-ground energy state, and generating a plasma discharge in the electrolyte. The applicants have determined that this method generates substantially more energy than the power input used to generate the plasma, whilst doing so in a controllable manner.

        Preferably, the plasma discharge is generated by applying a voltage across electrodes in the electrolyte and an intermittent voltage has proved particularly useful in increasing the level of energy generation. It also provides a means of controlling the process to maintain a consistent level of energy production over a significant period of time.

        The application of a voltage higher than necessary to generate plasma also is beneficial to the process and will be typically in the range of 50 V to 20,000 V and preferably between 300 V and 2,000 V, but may be higher than 20,000 V, whereas in conventional electrolysis techniques low voltages of about 3 volts are used and applied continuously across the electrodes.

        The applied voltage may be DC or provided at a switching frequency of up to 100 KHz. The duty cycle of the applied voltage is preferably in the range of 0.5 to 0.001, but may be even lower than 0.001. During the pulse period a monomolecular layer of metal hydride may be formed at the cathode-Helmholtz layer interface and subsequently decays to form gas in the nascent state comprising comprising monoatomic hydrogen and/or deuterium. The waveform of the applied voltage may be substantially square shaped. Whilst application of DC to the electrode does produce the metal hydride and monoatomic hydrogen and/or deuterium, the use of a pulsed voltage has been found to be more efficient as most dissociation of the hydride then occurs between the pulses.

        In applications where the electrolyte is flowed past the electrodes it may be preferable to use two separate cathodes, the first of which will be engineered to optimize production of H/D atoms and the second of which will provide the plasma discharge. In this instance the direction of flow of the electrolyte is from first to second cathode. The design of the apparatus seeks to direct the flow of electrolyte to maximize contact of monoatomic H or D atoms with the plasma. The characteristics and magnitude of the voltages applied to each cathode are preferably similar, but may have different duty periods.

        In a preferred embodiment, the cathode design and applied voltage are such as to provide a current density of 400,000 amps per square meter or even greater. More preferably, the current density at the cathode is 50,000 amps per square meter or above.

        In carrying out a preferred method in accordance with the invention, it has been found that the process may be assisted by initial heating of the electrolyte, which may be water or a salt solution, prior to applying electrical input to the vessel. A temperature in the range of 40 to 100 C, or more preferably 40° to 80° C, has been found to be particularly beneficial.

        The ratio of water to deuterium oxide (D2)) in the electrolyte may be varied to control the energy generation. In some circumstances it may be preferable to use "light" water H2O alone and in others to use D2O alone. Additionally, the amount of catalyst added to the electrolyte may be varied as a controlling factor and preferably lies in the range of 1 to 20 mMol.

        In preferred embodiments, the method includes the step of generating a magnetic field in the region of the electrodes. The intensity and/or frequency of the current used to generate the field may be adjusted to move the plasma discharge away from the electrode from which it is struck in order to minimize erosion and extend the operating life of the system. Only slight separation may be required to achieve this effect.

        In further preferred embodiments, the heat generated by the process may be removed and utilized by way of a number of known and proven technologies including the circulation of the electrolyte through a heat exchanger, or using heat pipes to produce heating, or alternatively to produce electricity using a pressurized steam cycle or a low-boiling-point fluid turbine cycle, or by other means.

        The present invention further provides apparatus for carrying out methods discloded herein comprising an anode, first and second cathodes, a reaction vessel having an inlet and an outlet, means for feeding an electrolyte through the vessel from its inlet to its outlet, the electrolyte having a catalyst therein suitable for initiating transitions of H and/or D atoms in the electrolyte to a sub-ground energy state, menas for applying a voltage across the anode and the first cathode to form H and/or D atoms, and means for applying a voltage across the anode and second cathode to generate a plasma discharge from the first cathode.

        During the methods described herein, atoms of H and/or D are believed to undergo a fundamental change in their structure by exchange of photons with salts in solution. The applicants believe that this change, and the observed phenomena, can be explained as set out below.

        It is well known that a system comprising a spherical shell of charge (the electron path) located around an atomic nucleus constitutes a resonant cavity. Resonant systems act as the repository of photon energy of discrete frequencies. The absorption of photon energy by a resonant system excites the system to a higher-energy state. For any spherical resonant cavity, the relationship between a permitted radius and the wavelength of the absorbed photon is:

        2 pi r = n lambda

        (pi = 3.14...)
        where n is an integer
        and lambda is the wavelength

        For non-radiating or stable states, the relationship between the electron wavelength and the allowed radii is:

        (2)   2 pi [nr1] = 2 pi r(n) = n lambda(1) = lambda(n)

        where n = 1
        or n = 2, 3, 4...
        or n = 1/2, 1/3, 1/4...

        and lambda(1) = the allowed wavelength for n = 1
        r(1) = the allowed radius for n = 1

        In a hydrogen atom (and the following applies equally to a D atom), the ground state electron-path radius can be defined as r(0). There is normally no spontaneous photon emission from a ground state atom and thus there must be a balance between the centripetal and the electric forces present. Thus:

        (3)   [ m(e) . v12 ] / r(0)= Ze2 / ( 4 pi . epsilon(0) . r(0)2 )

        where m(e) = electron rest mass
        v1 = ground state electron velocity
        e = elementary charge
        epsilon(0) = electric constant (sometimes referred to as the permitivity of free space)
        Z = atomic number (for H, 1)

        Looking first at the excited (higher energy) states, where the hydrogen atom has absorbed photons of discrete wavelength/frequency (and hence energy), the system is again stable and normally non-radiating, and to maintain force balance, the effective nuclear charge becomes Zeff = Z/n, and the balance equation becomes:

        (4)  [ m(e) . vn2 ] / nr(0) = [ e2 / n ]

        where n = integer value of excited state (1, 2, 3...)
        vn = electron velocity in the nth excited state.

        He absorption of radiation by an atom thus results in an excited state which may decay to ground state, spontaneously, or be triggered to do so, resulting in the re-release of a quantum of energy in the form of a photon. In any system consisting of a large number of atoms, transitions between states are occurring continuously and randomly and this activity gives rise to the observable spectra of emitted radiation from H.

        Each value of n corresponds to a transition which is permitted to occur when a resonant photon is absorbed by the atom. Integer values of n represent the absorption of energy by the atom.

        Fractional values of are allowed by the relationship between the standing wavelength of the electron and the radius of the electron-path, given by (2), above. To maintain force balance, transitions involving fractional values for n must effectively increase the nuclear charge Z to a figure Zeff, and reduce the radius of the electron-path accordingly. This is equivalent to the atom emitting a photon of energy while in the accepted ground state, effecting a transition to a sub-ground state. Because the accepted ground state is a very stable one, such transitions are rarely encountered but the applicants have discovered that they can be induced if the atom is in close proximity to another system which acts as a "receptor-site" for the exact energy quantum required to effect the transition.

        The emission of energy by a hydrogen atom in this way is not limited to a single transition "down" from ground state, but can occur repetitively and, possibly, transitions from 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, etc. states may occur as a single event if the energy balance of the atom and the catalytic system is favorable. Of course, the usual uncertainty principles forbid the determination of the behavior of any individual atom, but statistical rules govern the properties of any macroscopic (>109) quanta system.

        When a "ground-state" hydrogen atom emits a photon of around 27 eV, the transition occurs to the ao/2state as demonstrated above and the effective nuclear charge increases to +2e. A new electron path radius is reduced. The potential energy of the atom in its reduced-radius state is given by

        V = -{ Z(eff)e2 / [ 4 pi epsilon(o) (a(o) / 2)]} = - { 4 x 27.178} = -108.7 eV

        The kinetic energy, T, of the reduced electron path is given by

        T = - [ V / 2 ] = 54.35 eV

        Similarly, it can be seen that the kinetic energy of the ground sate electron path is about 13.6 eV. Thus there is a net change in energy of about 41 eV for the transition:

        H{ Z(eff) = 1 ; r = a(o) } to H{ Z(eff) = 2 ; r = a(o) / 2 ]

        That is to say, of this 41 eV, about 27 eV is emitted as the catalytic transfer of energy occurs, and the remaining 14 eV is emitted on restabilization to the force balance.

        The radial "ground-state" can be considered as a superposition of Fourier components. If integral Fourier components of energy equal to m x 27.2 eV are removed, the positive electric path inside the electron path radius increases by

        (m) x 1.602 x 10-19C

        The resultant electric field is a time-harmonic solution of the Laplace equations in spherical coordinates. In the case of the reduced-radius H atom, the radius at which force balance and the non-radiative condition are achieved is given by

        R(m) = a(o) / [m+1 ]

        Where m is an integer.

        From the energy change equations given above, it will be appreciated that, in decaying to this radius from the so-called "ground-state", the atom emits a total energy equal to

        (5)   [ ( m + 1 )2 - 12 ] x 13.59 eV

        The applicants have found that such energy emissions as take place according to (5), above, only appear to occur when the H or D is found in the monoatomic (or so-called "nascent") state. Molecular H might be made to behave similarly, but the transition is more difficult to achieve owing to the higher energies involved.

        In order to achieve the transition in monoatomic H or D, it is necessary to accumulate the molecular form in the gas phase on a substrate such as nickel (Ni) or tungsten (W) which favors the dissociation of the molecule. As well as being dissociated into the monoatomic form, the H or D should be bound to the catalytic system to initiate the reaction. The preferred method of achieving this is by electrolysis using cathode material which favors dissociation.

        The applicants have discovered that the catalytic systems which encourage transitions to sub-ground-state energies are those which offer a near-perfect energy couple to the [ m x 27.2 ] eV needed to "flip" the atom of H or D. It appears from experiment that the effective sink of energy provided by the catalyst need not be precisely equal to that emitted by the atom. Successful transitions have been achieved when there is an error of a s much as +- 2% between the energy emitted by the atom and that absorbed by the catalytic system. One possible explanation for this is that, in a macroscopic sized system, although the transitions are initiated by a close match in energy level, such discrepancies as arise are manifested as an overall loss or gain in the kinetic energies of the recipient ionic systems. It is thought that spectroscopic analysis of active H or D catalytic systems may provide evidence of this.

        One catalyst that has been found to initiate the transition to the ao/n state is rubidium in the Rb+ ionic species. If a salt of Rb, such as the carbonate Rb2CO3 is dissolved in either water or deuterium oxide (heavy water), a substantial dissociation into Rb+ and (CO3)2- ions takes place. If the Rb+ ions are bound closely to monoatomic H or D, the transition to the ao/n state is encouraged by the removal of a further electron from the Rb ion, by provision of its second ioization energy of about 27.28eV. Thus:

        Rb+ +H { a(o) / p ] +27.28 eV  -->

        Rb2+ + e- +H { a(o) / [ p = 1] } + { [ ( p + 1 )2 -p2 ] x 13.59 } eV

        Where p represents an integral number of such transitions for any given H and D atom and by spontaneous re-association:

        Rb2+ + e- = Rb+ +27.28 eV

        Thus, the Rb catalyst remains unchanged in the reaction and there is a net yield of energy per transition.

        Other catalytic systems can be used which have ionization energies approximating to [ m x 27.2 ] eV, such as titanium in the form of Ti2+ ions  and potassium in the form of K+ ions.

        The applicants believe that the above explanation is consistent with currently accepted quantum theory as discussed below.

        Commencing with the equations of Rydberg and Scroedinger it can be shown that fractional numbers for the quantum theory energy states in H yield possible transitions which result in emissions at frequencies which are in accord with observed UV and X-ray spectra. It is therefore possible that the conditions conducive to initiating such transitions may be artificially reproduced in the laboratory under certain circumstances.

        The Rydberg formula for the frequency of emitted radiation from a transition in monoatomic H is:

        V = R(h)c( 1 / n(2)2 - 1 / n(1)2 )

        Where:

        V is the frequency of the emitted photon
        R(h) is the Rydberg constant, 1.097373 c 107 m-1

        C is the speed of light in vacuo, 2.997 x 103 ms-1

        and

        n(1), n(2) are the transition states.

        It can be seen from the above that, if the resultant energy state of the H atom is that which requires n(2) to be equal to 1/2 , emissions will occur which are of higher frequency than the observed Lyman 2-1 transition in the ultra-violet at 2.467 x 1o15 Hz (about 121 nm). There is, indeed, an observed emission at a wavelength of about 30.8 nm, which appears to be confirmed by recent studies of galactic cluster emissions by Bohringer, et al. (Scientific American, January 1999) and it is difficult for the inventor to conceive of any other quantum-mechanical event which would give rise to such an emission, other than a transition, in accord with the above theory, from 1 to 1/2 in nascent H.

        As can be seen from the above use of the standard Rydbberg equation, such behavior of H in the monoatomic state views the conventional H "ground-state" as one of many stable electronically-preferred states for single H atoms.

        To summarize, a proliferation of H or D atoms is produced which may have had significantly diminished electron-path-radii by virtue of exchange of photons with their envronment. These atoms appear to be relatively unreactive chemically and appear not to readily take the molecular form H-H or D-D. This is a fortunate property which has significance and enables fusion pathways, as described below.

        The fusion of light nuclei, H and D, to form heavier elements such as He is one which has traditionally been encouraged by subjecting the reactants to extremes of temperature and pressure. This has been necessary because there is a large electric charge barrier to overcome in order to bring nuclei close enough for fusion to occur.

        Using atoms with a diminished electron path radius, adjacent nuclei may experience a corresponding reduction in electric barrier and internuclear separations may become smaller. With reductions in internuclear separation, fusion processes become more probable, and more easily occasioned.

        There are two principle fusion pathways for D atoms. The first is:

        1D2 + 1D2 = 2He3 + 1n0

        where two D nuclei fuse to produce an isotope of He and a free neutron, which subsequently decays (half-life 6.48 x 102 S), with emission of a beta particle of medium energy (about 0.8 MeV), and a type of neutrino, to become a stable proton.

        The second is:

        1D2 + 1D2 = 1T3 + 1H1

        where the two D nuclei fuse to produce the isotope of H known as tritium (T) and a free stable proton. The tritium eventually decays (half-life 12.3 years), with emission of a beta particle of very low energy (about 0.018 MeV), to become 2He3.

        Of the two, the second fusion path is preferred for the peaceful exploitation of its energy yield, because the fusion products are relatively harmless on production, and decay to completely innocuous species within a short time, emitting radiation which can be effectively shielded by a thin sheet of aluminum foil or by 10 mm of acrylic plastic, for example.

        When D nuclei are forced together under high temperature and pressure conditions (as in a thermonuclear bomb), there is a greater than 50% probability for the first pathway to be the dominant one. This is because the high temperature process takes no account of nuclear alignment at the point of fusion. It is actually a matter of focusing nuclei together indiscriminately and hoping that enough fuse to produce an explosion. The applicants believe, however, in accord with established theory, that it is the alignment of the nuclei with respect to the charges in each nucleus which ultimately determines the favorable fusion path.

        In order to achieve a higher probability for the second, less hazardous pathway, the approaching nuclei need to have time to align electrostatically such that the proton-proton separation is at a maximum. This can only be achieved at far lower energies than those found in a thermonuclear bomb. By the use of entities with diminished electron-path-radii, and correspondingly potentially smaller internuclear distances, fusion can be initiated at lower temperatures (and consequently lower energies), allowing for the charge-related alignment necessary to achieve a high probability for the second, tritium-forming, pathway. By introducing D of diminished electron-path-radius into the plasma discharge which is confined within the water in the vessel itself, fusion may be initiated. Temperatures of the order of 6000° K are obtained within certain plasma discharges and this, coupled with multiple quantum transitions to produce D of diminished electron-path-radius, produces a substantial yield of energy from the two-stage process.

        Another possible but less likely fusion pathway for hydrogen atoms is:

        1H1 + 1H1 = 1D2 + Beta+ + tau

        whereby Beta+ is produced as one of the products.

        Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings, wherein:

        Figure 1 shows an apparatus for carrying out a method in accordance with the invention on a relatively small scale;

        Figure 2 shows a system for operating and measuring the performance of the apparatus of Figure 1;

        Figure 3 shows a circuit diagram high voltage, high frequency switching circuit for the system of Figure 2;


        Figure 4 shows an apparatus for carrying out a method in accordance with the invention on a larger scale than that of the Figure 1 apparatus; and

        Figure 5 shows a further apparatus for carrying out a method of the invention which includes two cathodes.


        The apparatus of Figure 1 enables the generation of energy according to the principles of the invention in the laboratory. Any risk of thermal runaway is minimized whilst demonstrating that the level of energy release from the two stages is far in excess of that which would result from any purely chemical or electrochemical activity. It also enables easy calorimetry, safe ducting away of off-gases, and of subsequent extraction of liquid for titration (to demonstrate that no chemical action takes place during the operation of the apparatus).

        A 250 ml beaker is provided with a glass quilt or expanded polystyrene surround 6 to act as insulation. This can include an inspection cut-out so that the area around the cathode 9 can be observed from outside. The beaker contains 200 ml of water, into which is dissolved a small quantity of potassium carbonate so as to give a solution of approximately 2 mMol strength. A platinum wire 1 is earthed to the laboratory reference ground plane. The anode 10, a sheet of platinum foil of approximately 10 mm2 in area, is attached to this wire by mechanical crimping. A digital thermometer 2 is inserted into the liquid in the vessel. A 0.25 mm diameter tungsten wire cathode 9 is sheathed in borosilicate glass or ceramic tube 4 and sealed at the end immersed in the electrolyte so as to expose 10 mm to 20 mm of wire in contact with the liquid. The entire assembly of lead wires and the thermometer is carried by an acrylic plate 5 which enables of easy dismantling and inspection of the apparatus.

        A supply of up to 360 volts DC, capable of supplying up to 2 amperes, is arranged external to the described apparatus. The positive terminal of this supply is connected to one pole of an isolated high-voltage switching unit. The other pole of the switch is connected to the tungsten wire cathode 9 externally of the apparatus.

        To operate the apparatus, the solution 8 is initially brought up to between 40° C and 80° C either by preheating outside the apparatus or by passing power through a heating element in the solution (not shown). When the solution is between these temperatures it is either transferred to the above apparatus or, if a heating element is used, this is turned off.

        With all connections made as described, the switch is set to operate at a duty cycle of 1% and a pulse repetition frequency of 100 Hz. It will be seen through the inspection cut-out that an intense plasma-arc is intermittently struck under the water at or near the cathode. If equipment is available to monitor the current drawn, it will be seen that the system consumes in the region of 1 watt when the switching circuit is operating. It will be seen by the rapid rise in temperature in the apparatus that far more energy is being released than can be accounted for by the electrical input. As a comparison, a heater element can be substituted for the electrodes and operated at 1 watt and the effects observed. There is really no need for sophisticated calorimetry to verify that large quantities of energy are being released close to the cathode of the equipment, such is the magnitude of the reaction for the process, as compared to a test with a resistive heating element of the same input power.

        The data obtained from a representative one-hour session with this apparatus is shown in Table 1, below:

        Table 1

        Pre-Run Measurements :

        Commencing volume of electrolyte = 0.200 liter
        Commencing temperature of cell = 39.200° C
        Laboratory ambient temperature = 20.500° C
        Specific heat capacity of vessel = 70.300 J. °C-1
        Specific heat capacity of electrolyte = 4180.000 J. I-1 °C-1
        Steady RMS voltage = 4.0 volts
        Steady RMS current = 0.067 amps

        Post-Run Results :

        Duration of input = 3600 seconds
        Final volume of electrolyte = 0.180 liter
        Final temperature of cell = 93.6° C
        Steady RMS voltage = 6.7 volts
        Steady RMS current = 0.122 amps
        Time-averaged power in = 0.506 watts

        Results Summary :

        Vessel gain = 3824.320 Joules
        Electrolyte gain = 43181.740 Joules
        Radiated power = 38681.030 Joules
        Evaporated loss = 48509.240 Joules

        Total Energy In = 1820.070 Joules
        Total Energy Output = 134196.300 Joules

        It can be seen from this table that the total energy input during this test was measured at 1820 J and, taking as a rough guideline that 200 ml of water requires the input of 838 J of energy to raise it by 1° C, then by direct heating the water would be expected to rise by some 2° C, bearing in mind radiative losses. In fact, during the experiment the water temperature was raised from 39.2° C to 93.6° C and considerable steam was also liberated. Furthermore, the calculated energy output of 134196 J does not take account of secondary effects such as light-energy output and Faradaic electrolysis

        A system suitable for operating the apparatus of Figure 1 is illustrated in block diagram in Figure 2. A pulse generator 20 supplies a variable duty-cycle pulse waveform to to a high-voltage switch unit 22. The pulse waveform may be monitored on an oscilloscope 24 and its repetition frequency is displayed on a first frequency counter 26. A second frequency counter 28 is provided to monitor the clock speed of the switch unit 22. Power supply 30 is operable to apply a voltage between 0 and 360 V to an electrode of the apparatus 12, shown in Figure 1. The voltage level may be read from a digital multimeter 32. The RMS voltage across the electrodes 9 and 10 is indicated on a multimeter 34 and the RMS current passing between the electrodes is shown on another multimeter 36, by measuring the voltages developed across a 1 ohm resistor 37. The temperature in the apparatus 12 is indicated on a dip temperature probe 38. The switch unit 22 may be bypassed by a push button switch 39 to apply a constant voltage across the electrodes.

        A circuit diagram of the switch unit 22 is shown in Figure 3. In the system of Figure 2, input 40 is connected to the output of pulse generator 20. The output 42 of the switch unit is connected to the cathode of the apparatus 12. Two NAND gates 44 and 46 are two fourths of a Schmitt-trigger 2 input NAND gate chip type 4093. NAND gate 44 operates as an astable multivibrator, with its repetition frequency set by a preset resistor 45. The output of gate 44 is fed to one in-out of NAND gate 46, the other input forming circuit input 40. The output of NAND gate 46 is connected to a three-transistor amplifier consisting of transistors 48, 50 and 52. The amplifier is in turn connected to one end of the primary of a transformer 54, the other end being connected to earth. The transformer output is fed to a bridge rectifier formed from diodes 56, 58, 60 and 62.

        The rectifier output is fed via a resistor 64 to the gate of an insulated gate bipolar transistor 6 (IGBT). The load of the apparatus 12 is connected in the drain circuit of the IGBT. A 15 kV diode 68 is connected between the drain and the source of the IGBT 66 to protect  the IGBT from the sizeable EMI emissions from the plasma discharges in the apparatus 12 and avoids damage to this sensitive semiconductor. A further diode 70 is provided between the drain of the IGBT and the circuit output 42 to act as an EMI blocker in a similar way. A standard 20 mm 5 amp quick-blow fuse 69 is connected between the source of the IGBT and ground in order to protect the device against over-current.

        The operation of the circuit of Figure 3 is as follows. The repetition frequency in NAND gate 44 is preferably set to between 4 and 6 MHz. Pulse generator 20 is adjusted to set the duty of the switching. On receipt of an external pulse from the generator, NAND gate 46 passes a packet of 4 to 6 MHz square waves to the amplifier. The amplifier has considerable current gain and enable the primary of the transformer 54 to be driven resonantly with the RC circuit formed by capacitor 72 and resistor 74 which are connected in parallel therewith. The transformer 54 has a step-up ratio of 2:1 and a 4 to 6 MHz signal of approximately 19 volts appears across the bridge rectifier. The impedance of the rectifier output is essentially determined by a parallel resistor 76, such that the switch-on and switch-off time of the IGBT 66 is very fast. Thus, there is never a point in the operation of the device when it is dissipating any measurable power. The load of the apparatus 12 is placed in the drain circuit of the IGBT, which is therefore operating in "common-source" mode to ensure that its source terminal never rises above the high-side ground potential. This, again, is a configuration which uses excess input power. This circuit ensures a rise time of the switched waveform which isles than 10 nS and a fall time which can be as low as 30 nS at modest supply voltages.

        Preferred component values and types for the circuit of Figure 3 are as follows:

        Transistors 4, 50 = 2N 3649
        Transistor 52 = 2N 3645
        Diodes 56, 58, 60, 62 = BAT85 Schottky
        Transformer 54 = RS195-460
        IGBT 66 = GT8Q101
        Diode 68 = 15 kV EHT
        Diode 70 = 1N1198A
        Resistor 47 = 1.8 kOhm
        Resistor 51 = 33 Ohm
        Resistor 53 = 220 Ohm
        Resistor 74 = 56 Ohm
        Resistor 76 = 560 Ohm
        Resistor 64 = 56 Ohm
        Capacitor 49 = 10 pF
        Capacitor 55 = 33 nF
        Capacitor 72 = 22 pF

        A second apparatus for carrying out the invention is illustrated in Figure 4. This apparatus comprises a tubular chamber 80, which may be constructed from a nonmagnetic metal or metal alloy material such as, but not exclusively, aluminum or Duralumin, or alternatively may be constructed from a non-permeable ceramic material or from borosilicate glass. The tubular chamber 80 is constructed in flanged form to allow of its incorporation into a system of pipework via flanges 82 and 84 and gaskets 86. Entering the chamber 80 are two electrodes, the cathode 88 being shaped so as to present a circular plate opposite the cathode 88. The distance between the cathode tip and the anode plate should be approximately equal to the radius of the chamber 80. The cathode may be constructed from tungsten, zirconium, stainless steel, nickel or tantalum, or any other metallic or conductive ceramic material which may contribute to, or occasion, the dissociative process described above. The anode may be constructed from platinum, palladium, rhodium or any other inert material which does not undergo any significant level of chemical interaction with the electrolyte.

        Surrounding the chamber 80, and concentric with it, is a winding 98 of enameled copper or silver wire of diameter 0.1 to 0.8 mm consisting of up to several thousand turns of the wire. The purpose of this winding is to create an axial magnetic field inside the chamber 80.

        Electrolyte comprising deuterium oxide, in combination with ordinary "light" water in varying proportions, and containing high-molarity salts of, but not exclusively of, potassium, rubidium or lithium, or combinations of such salts, is pumped through the chamber 80, in a direction such that the anode is downstream of the cathode.

        The anode lead wire 96 is connected to the ground plane or zero volts. The cathode 88 is connected to a variable source of between 50 and preferably 2000 volts negative with respect to the grounded anode 94, but may be couple to a voltage of up to several tens of thousands of volts negative with respect to such anode 94. To enhance performance of the invention, the negative voltage may be supplied in the form of pulses having a duty cycle between 0.001 and 0.5

        The winding 98 is energized with an alternating voltage such as to provide a current flow of typically between 0.5 and 1.5 amps initially. The frequency of the applied alternating voltage should be variable from DC up to 15 KHz and may, in addition, be synchronous with pulses applied to the cathode 88.

        Under these conditions, a plasma arc will strike close to the cathode 88. The intensity and frequency of the current flowing in winding 98 may be adjusted to provide for the removal of the plasma arc from the immediate vicinity of the cathode 88 to avoid excessive evaporation of the material from the cathode 88.

        The volume of electrolyte pumped through chamber 80 and past the plasma arc may be varied such as to stabilize the temperature of such electrolyte in a closed system at below its boiling point.

        Heat may be extracted from the electrolyte by passing it through a heat exchanger before its re-introduction into the chamber 80. Provision may be made to top-off the water-deuterium content of the electrolyte as this becomes depleted by operation of the apparatus. The system may operate at a range of pressures to facilitate heat removal.

        A further apparatus for carrying out the invention, similar to that of Figure 4, is shown in Figure 5 on a scale of approximately 1:2:5. It comprises a borosilicate reaction tube 100 supported at one end on a machined nylon support bridge 102. A second machined nylon element 104 is mounted across the other end of the tube. The bridge 102 and element 104 are clamped against the tube 100 by 8 mm threaded stainless steel studs 110.

        A first cathode 106 is in the form of a nickel wire mesh. It is mounted towards one end of tube 100 on a stainless steel support 108. Electrical connection to the first cathode 106 is via a PVS-sleeved wire (not shown).

        A second cathode 112 consists of a 0.5mm diameter length of tungsten wire provided within a drilled macor ceramic sheath 114, which is in turn placed within a 10 mm stainless steel tube 116. Tube 116 passes through the support 102 and has a perspex end cap 118 on the external end through which the second cathode 112 passes. A PVC funnel 120 is provided around the second cathode and is tapered towards it, with the cathode tip adjacent the narrower open end thereof. The funnel is supported on sleeves 121 provided on the stainless steel support 108.

        The anode comprises a 0.25 mm diameter platinum wire 122 which is connected at one end within the tube 100 to a sheet of platinum foil 124. Like the second cathode 11s, the anode is provided within a 10 mm diameter stainless steel tube 126, which passes through nylon element 104 and is closed at its external end by a Perspex end cap 128. Platinum wire 122 passes through the end cap 128.

        A plasma deflection coil 130 is mounted within tube 100 between the anode 124 and cathodes 106, 112. Electrical power is fed to the coil via connectors 132.

        Electrolyte is supplied to the tube 100 via a brass inlet 134 provided through the support bridge 102 and flows out through nylon element 104 via a brass outlet 136. An additional brass outlet 138 also is provided in nylon element 104 to allow the electrolyte to be sampled during operation of the apparatus. Fuse holders and cable connectors for the apparatus are provided in a unit 140 mounted on the support bridge 102.

        The apparatus of Figure 5 is operated in a similar manner to that of Figure 4, as discussed above. The primary distinction is that two cathodes 106, 112 are employed in place of a single cathode. In use, electrolyte is fed through the tube 100, past the electrodes, from inlet 134 to outlet 136. A pulsed voltage is applied to the first cathode 106 such that a layer of metal hydride is formed on its surface during the voltage pulses and subsequently dissociates to form nascent monoatomic H/D. The applied voltage characteristics are selected to optimize the production rate of the monoatomic H/D. These products are channeled toward the second cathode 112 by the funnel 120. A voltage is applied to the second cathode 112 to generate a plasma discharge thereat.

        The characteristics and magnitudes of the voltages applied to the first and second cathodes may be similar, but it may be advantageous for different duty periods to be employed for respective cathodes. This cathode arrangement with the second cathode downstream of the first seeks to maximize contact between the monoatomic H/D and the plasma and therefore the efficiency of the apparatus. This is further assisted by the funnel 120.

        ✰* Revealed At Last: Recreate the "Searl Effect Generator" construction by free energy experts:

        Generates Energy-On-Demand▶️ Searl Effect Generator 

        Summary of operation of Searl Effect Generator:
        • The rotating permanent magnet is the stirring of the Ether. The generator does not generate electricity, it is just a place to manifest energy from the Ether.
        • Copper material with Tesla's Bifilar-style winding, like a DNA double helix. The electromagnetic field (EMF) after generating a voltage inherently harmful to the generator (it will stop the magnet from rotating - Lenz's law) becomes beneficial.
        • The rotor rollers are Copper coated magnets, they will be driven by the voltage on the coil itself, creating resonance.
        • The output voltage depends on the speed of the rotor roller and the number of turns.
        • The speed of the rotor roller is controlled by a custom frequency, square pulse voltage applied to the control coil.
        Note:
        • This incredible feat is due to the instability of having an AC sine imprint on the plate and a cosine print on the rollers - instability created as the fields conflict causes the rollers to orbit the plate. They are held down by the magnetic field and thrown out by the centrifugal forces, so the rollers do not actually touch the plate when in motion.
        JOHN SEARL'S GENERATOR  ✰* ✰* ✰* ✰* ✰*
        • It is a detailed instruction on how to make a genuine Searl Effect Generator with high capacity by yourself..
        • In particular, you can make your own Searl Effect Generator in the simplest way (Searl Effect Generator has been simplified), without requiring complicated materials like John Searl's genuine work, but still achieving high performance.


              Related

              Real Free Energy 4280555208965067509

              Post a Comment

              emo-but-icon

              Follow Us

              Hot in week

              Recent

              Comments

              item